The Government’s credibility deficit on Defence spending

By Kevan Jones MP, Shadow Armed Forces Minister.

With a humiliating u-turn on the aircraft carrier programme completed, Philip Hammond took the brave step of claiming the Defence budget is balanced over the next ten years. The triumphalism was predictably cheered on his own benches. His problem, however, is that not even they are convinced, since ministers’ mistakes have eroded confidence in their handling of defence.

Let’s remember the time-consuming and expensive aircraft carrier debacle. Ministers have reverted to purchasing the fast jets earmarked by the previous Labour Government after deriding our plans as a ‘mistake’. Hammond’s sole argument is that the facts have changed, but in truth he has changed his mind after examining the facts.

The Public Accounts Committee warned of the rising cost of the Government’s policy. The National Audit Office warned that the Government had an ‘immature understanding’ of costs. The Defence Select Committee warned against strategic shrinkage. Ministers failed to heed these multiple warnings. Continue reading

“The MoD is losing key skills, morale is in freefall and taxpayers’ money is being wasted” – Kevan Jones MP

Kevan Jones MP, Labour’s Shadow Armed Forces Minister, commenting on the Public Accounts Committee report “Ministry of Defence: Managing Change in the Defence Workforce”, said:

“This is a damning condemnation of the Government’s reform programme.

“The rushed defence review put savings before strategy with damaging consequences.

“Ministers’ decisions mean the MoD is losing key skills, morale is in freefall and taxpayers’ money is being wasted. Continue reading

“Only this government could melt multi-billion pound aircraft carriers” – Kevan Jones MP

Commenting on newspaper reports that US trials show the Royal Navy’s new Harrier-style jump jet could melt the decks of aircraft carriers, Shadow Defence Minister Kevan Jones MP said:

“The country will be exasperated at the Government’s chaotic carrier programme. How can we trust a government which cannot competently complete such a vital piece of equipment essential to national security?

“Only this government could melt multi-billion pound aircraft carriers. Continue reading

“We need respect and compassion for Scottish military history not disregard and uncertainty” – Jim Murphy MP

Commenting on the launch of the cross-party campaign to force the government to ‘respect our regiments’ Shadow Defence Secretary, Jim Murphy MP said:

“We need respect and compassion for Scottish military history not disregard and uncertainty.

“The defence community will have been dismayed by the insensitivity shown by the Tories about the potential loss of traditional cap badges and regimental names.

“I am launching this cross-party campaign because all those in Scotland passionate about our military tradition and communities will want the Government to show more respect to our regiments.

“This not just about Scotland’s pride but protecting the long and enduring relationship within the British Armed Forces.

“Scotland has been part of the British Forces’ DNA and history. Many Scottish units have histories dating back to the 18th Century or before and have been deployed in conflicts in Northern Ireland, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan.

“I recently met young Royal navy Scots who served in Libya; their bravery was only exceeded by their modesty.

“The military bond is in jeopardy from Government plans to cut 30,000 from the Army. Savings have to be found and change is needed, but we worry these cuts are rushed with little indication of the impact of such a loss of capability.

“Communities across Scotland will not want to see historic cap badges cast aside. I urge the Government to think again.”

“The Government has been reckless where care was essential and timid when boldness is required” – Jim Murphy

Jim Murphy MPLabour’s Shadow Defence Secretary Jim Murphy MP, responding to claims today by Defence Secretary Philip Hammond that he has ‘balanced’ the MOD budget, said:

“We will judge today’s statement not on reheated slogans but on the detail published. Procurement reform is essential, but we have little detail to support grand claims.
 
“The Government must provide the right balance between flexible force structures, strengthening Alliances and budgetary stability.
 
“Short term control of defence costs in order to support careful deficit reduction needs to be coupled with long term reform. The Government, however, has been reckless where care was essential and timid when boldness is required.
 
“The Defence Secretary has said that there will be no more cuts over and above what he’s already announced. This will be of little consolation to the thousands of service personnel yet to be sacked, those facing a £900m cut to allowances and the veterans and war widows whose pensions are being cut year-on-year.
 
“We welcome additional expenditure on our Forces made in today’s statement, but this largely represents a continuation of important programmes begun by Labour.”

Further questions that Defence Secretary Philip Hammond must answer:

  • What is the risk built in to each of the programmes contained in the equipment plan and is this covered by the £8bn contingency?
  • What programmes have been delayed or cut to enable today’s announcement?
  • When will the Defence Secretary publish the equipment plan and NAO report?
  • Will the Defence Secretary break down the claimed “£38bn” and how it has been filled?
  • Will the remaining 55% of the defence budget be cut after 2015 to fund the 1% increase?

“Defence is about more than inputs, outputs and spreadsheets. It is also about people, tradition and pride.” – Jim Murphy MP

Jim Murphy MP, Labour’s Shadow Defence Secretary, said in response to Philip Hammond’s interview in the Daily Telegraph today:

“The defence community will be dismayed that history is being dismissed.

“Defence is about more than inputs, outputs and spreadsheets. It is also about people, tradition and pride.

“Philip Hammond seems either oblivious or uncaring about the historic ties that many communities have to Army units and vice versa.

“The country will want confidence the Defence Secretary is doing all possible to preserve important historic legacies. More has got to be done to end this uncertainty and worry.

“The Army is currently ‘top heavy’ and the Government must go further than planned to cut the numbers of senior officers to tackle imbalance.

“Savings have to be made and Army restructuring is required, but Ministers must do so in way that makes our Forces more efficient while respecting longstanding ties.”

The Need for Defence Diplomacy

Jim Murphy MPBy Jim Murphy MP, Shadow Defence Secretary

The globalised world in which we live, with its rapidly evolving modern threats combined with budgetary pressures for almost all nations, means coalition-building and greater international co-operation are central to modern defence policy.  Maximising global reach and influence today demands new partnerships and collaborations with governments and publics around the world.  A strong multilateral defence policy, therefore, is a necessary response.

Multilateralism in defence must span all aspects of policy, from generating equipment programmes to supporting multinational institutions, from capacity building in developing nations to deeper bilateral partnerships. Public diplomacy can also contribute to this  modern arsenal. Continue reading