Volunteers for Army job cuts put service in disarray

From today’s Times newspaper

Volunteers for Army job cuts put service in disarray

Downing Street was accused of playing politics with soldiers’ jobs last night, as commanders voiced fears that thousands of Army redundancies were leaving critical roles unfilled.

Documents seen by The Times show how No 10 has leant on military chiefs to accept voluntary rather than compulsory redundancies when 5,000 posts are due to be cut this month.

Commanders argue that this would affect their ability to control the future shape of the Army, with talented soldiers free to leave and less-competent or important staff allowed to remain.

There was also concern about whether the Territorial Army is able to fill the gap left by the cuts, with documents and internal data showing a growing number of job vacancies that are putting the regular Forces under growing strain.

Patrick Mercer, a Conservative MP and former Army colonel, said that it was wrong for politicians to interfere with military planning.

“When you come to redundancies it is deeply unpalatable, then the Government starts interfering,” he added. “Compulsory redundancy is important if you are restructuring.”

Dan Jarvis, another former Army officer and a Labour MP, said that there had been a conflict between Downing Street and the Ministry of Defence for the past two years of painful restructuring aimed at cutting costs and improving efficiency.

“I understand why there is this tension, but having made the difficult and controversial decision about the cuts, you cannot undermine the logic that underpins those cuts by short-term political expediency. Undoubtedly this comes at the cost of long-term operational capability,” Mr Jarvis added.

An internal Army e-mail, headed “Redundancy War Game” sent among a group of senior officers, discussed plans to implement the next two tranches of redundancies.

One officer wrote on November 27, last year: “All the evidence to date is that No 10 is not yet convinced of the need for more tranches and the sensitivity is particularly acute over ‘non-applicants’.”

A second officer replied: “Despite the positive progress [so far] of the letter drafted for SoS [Philip Hammond] to No 10, regarding the measures to increase the number of applicants, there is a real risk that No 10 could still block all further ‘non-applicant’ redundancies.”

The Army is expected to shed 9,500 jobs during the next two years. But one senior officer said that there was a suspicion that the job cuts would be accelerated to get the pain over and done with more quickly.

Soldiers have been subjected to two previous rounds of redundancy as part of a plan to cut the size of the Army from 102,000 to 82,000 by 2020, a move that has damaged morale.

Internal briefing notes outline the growing number of vacancies, known as “gapping”. A letter to commanders from the Army Personnel Centre, dated September 13, 2012, spoke about “the growing problem of gapping across the Army”.

It concluded: “A shortage of manpower supply against demand will continue for some time, requiring frequent, timely and pragmatic engagement by the chain of command.”

The problem even appeared to be affecting the Army’s ability to fill jobs in Afghanistan, despite this being the MoD’s main focus.

The Times has seen an internal army memo from November “trawling” for three Lieutenant-Colonels to be available for the next tour in Helmand province. “Unfortunately we are at a spike in demand for army Lieutenant-Colonels that cannot be satisfied by any method other than by centralised trawls,” the memo said.

A Downing Street source said: “We do not recognise the suggestion that we have been trying to speed up the redundancy process. This is a complex issue and one that needs to be carefully considered.

“Yes, voluntary redundancies are always preferable but army restructuring is a decision for the military and the MoD, and it must be one which leaves us with a flexible Army with full operational capability.”


5 thoughts on “Volunteers for Army job cuts put service in disarray

  1. After just completeing 24 years in the Infantry, i still remember the last lot of redundancies in the 90’s. We still hadnt fully recovered from them, you cant cut the armed forces but not the jobs within units, for example will a fully fit infantry soldier (who wants to be on the front line)want to go and work in the stores issuing weapons and supplies? NO, you will always need experienced troops that are not as fit as they could or would want to be, these are the troops who carry out the VERY important tasks like working in the stores and providing logistic support to their relevant Company’s/Units (it can not be done by RLC) its a unit thing. To along story short the goverment will pay for their cuts in the long run, anyone who cant see that shouldnt be working there, The TA do a good job, but they cant do THE JOB! what are you thinking? I know for a fact there are some really good soldiers who because of the state that the Army finds it’s self in now would jump at the chance to leave! be carefull what you wish for!!!!!!!

    1. So correct Scott my son after 18 years service took the redundancy and ran,no disrespect to TA but it can be dangerousness to a full time solider as it is their profession, TA in most cases go home after work leaving the regulars to it . Cameron is killing the armed forces there in no need for enemies when you have him

  2. I think it is disgusting what is going on with cuts to the armed forces. Messrs. Cameron and Clegg should hang their heads is shame. Apart from anything else have they forgotten there is a referendum coming up to divide Scotland and England. They are not doing a lot to help a united Britain with their behaviour. We need our people in all of the armed forces, and they should be well paid and looked after, they ARE putting their lives on the line for the country. This fact should not just be recognised by giving them medals and awards, they should be rewarded by not cutting their numbers and being well paid for the jobs they do each and every day.

    1. I have just completed 24 years in the Infantry, to cut along story short when i left i was the assistant Intelligence Officer, no one replaced me before i left and as far as i am aware there is still no one in the job. This means that the Jnco’s that were there, are covering the Snco’s position! But everything is OK? Yeah right.

Comment or ask a question here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s